How I Evaluate Angel Investments

A framework for identifying structural advantage before underwriting execution

In partnership with

Last week, I wrote about angel investing as a portfolio strategy, not a bet.

This week, I want to explain how I decide which companies are even worth considering in the first place.

I’m not trying to predict winners.
I’m trying to answer two questions, in order:

  1. Why should this company be interesting at all?

  2. Given that reason, can it survive long enough to matter?

Most frameworks start with execution and work backward.
I start with structure.

Step 1: Structural Permission to Win

A company is only interesting to me if it has a non-competitive advantage — a structural reason it can access value that is not evenly available to others.

This has nothing to do with being “better.”
It’s about being allowed to do something others can’t easily replicate.

In practice, structural permission usually comes from one of four places:

  • Access advantage
    The company can reach customers, data, or distribution that competitors cannot quickly or cheaply obtain.

  • Economic advantage
    The company can operate profitably or at a cost structure others cannot sustain.

  • Switching or lock-in advantage
    Once adopted, inertia works in the company’s favor. Leaving is meaningfully painful.

  • Permission or constraint advantage
    Rules, regulation, trust, or time create barriers that execution alone cannot bypass.

A company does not need all of these.
One is enough.

If none are present, competition will eventually erase returns, no matter how good the team is.

Step 2: Proof of Life

Once a structural advantage exists, I look for evidence that the business actually works.

This is not theoretical.

I want to see:

  • real customers

  • real usage

  • real outcomes

  • rational unit economics

Ideas don’t survive.
Working systems do.

Step 3: Survivability

Only after the first two steps do I focus on execution risk.

Here I’m asking:

  • Is there a regulatory or structural kill switch?

  • Does the company have enough time (capital + discipline) to learn?

  • Can the founders adapt under uncertainty?

This isn’t about perfection.
It’s about avoiding obvious causes of death.

The Point

I don’t look for reasons a company might win someday.

I look for:

  1. a structural reason it should win

  2. proof it already creates value

  3. no clear reason it dies before scaling

Everything else is noise.

That’s how I think about angel investing.

If this way of thinking resonates, I’m continuing to build a small network where we share opportunities that meet this bar. There’s no obligation to invest — just exposure if something is interesting. Reply and I’ll loop you in.

This Week’s Affiliates

The Best Gift? Better Insurance Rates

While winter brings lots of good cheer, it can also mean new risks: icy roads, unexpected storms, and increased holiday travel. That makes now the perfect time to ensure that you and your family are fully protected. Your home, your vehicles, and your peace of mind all deserve coverage that fits your current life—not outdated premiums from years past.

EverQuote lets you compare personalized quotes for bundled home and auto policies, multi-car coverage, and more—all in one simple dashboard. Whether you're prepping for long drives to see family or keeping your home secure through the colder months, our tools help ensure your protection stays strong and your money works smarter.

Here’s an un-boring way to invest that billionaires have quietly leveraged for decades

If you have enough money that you think about buckets for your capital…

Ever invest in something you know will have low returns—just for the sake of diversifying?

CDs… Bonds… REITs… :(

Sure, these “boring” investments have some merits. But you probably overlooked one historically exclusive asset class:

It’s been famously leveraged by billionaires like Bezos and Gates, but just never been widely accessible until now.

It outpaced the S&P 500 (!) overall WITH low correlation to stocks, 1995 to 2025.*

It’s not private equity or real estate. Surprisingly, it’s postwar and contemporary art.

And since 2019, over 70,000 people have started investing in SHARES of artworks featuring legends like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso through a platform called Masterworks.

  • 23 exits to date

  • $1,245,000,000+ invested

  • Annualized net returns like 17.6%, 17.8%, and 21.5%

My subscribers can SKIP their waitlist and invest in blue-chip art.

Investing involves risk. Past performance not indicative of future returns. Reg A disclosures at masterworks.com/cd