Investing as Selective Sampling

How exposure to extremes drives returns

In partnership with

Hey Investors,

Many of you are engineers or scientists, so I want to frame this through a lens you already trust: statistics.

This isn’t about market narratives, stock picks, or forecasting skill.
It’s about sample size, variance, and why outperformance must look lopsided.

If you dislike statistical intuition, feel free to skip this one.
If you enjoy first-principles thinking, this framework explains far more about investing outcomes than most financial media ever will.

A brief review of statistics

In statistics, sampling is simple:

  • If you observe an entire population, you see the true distribution.

  • If you observe only a subset, you get an estimate of that distribution.

The estimate improves as the sample gets larger.

This is why large samples feel:

  • Stable

  • Predictable

  • Boring

And small samples feel:

  • Noisy

  • Unfair

  • Extreme

That’s not psychology.
That’s math.

Sample size controls variance — and extremes live in small samples

Here’s the key idea that matters for investing:

As sample size decreases, variance increases.

Smaller samples:

  • Deviate more from the population average

  • Contain more extreme outcomes (high and low)

  • Are where outliers show up

This is sometimes discussed under the “law of small numbers,” but the core point is simpler:

You don’t change the distribution — you change how much of it you’re exposed to.

Large samples dampen extremes.
Small samples surface them.

From random sampling to selective sampling

So far, everything assumes random sampling.

But in the real world — and especially in investing — sampling isn’t random.

Instead, we do something more interesting:

Selective sampling from a larger population

We:

  • Start with a large universe

  • Apply filters

  • Narrow the sample intentionally

  • Accept higher variance in exchange for exposure to extremes

This is the bridge to investing.

The S&P 500 is a very large sample

There are thousands of publicly listed U.S. stocks.

The S&P 500:

  • Selects 500 of them

  • Produces a large, stable sample

  • Approximates the overall market distribution

That’s why index funds:

  • Work extremely well

  • Deliver reliable, average outcomes

  • Smooth both winners and losers

They are doing exactly what large samples are supposed to do.

Venture capital is a much smaller sample

Venture capital operates on the same population logic — but with a much smaller sample size.

A VC fund:

  • Looks at thousands of startups

  • Invests in maybe 20–40

  • Expects most to fail or do “okay”

  • Relies on a few extreme winners to drive all returns

This works because returns follow power laws:

  • Losses are capped

  • Upside is unbounded

  • A tiny number of outcomes dominate the total

VCs aren’t trying to be right often.
They’re trying to be present when outliers occur.

My own portfolio follows the same pattern

When I look back at my own investing results, the distribution is always the same:

  • A few losers

  • Many average or market-like outcomes

  • A small number of exceptional winners

Only the exceptional winners beat the index.

Everything else just exists to:

  • Stay invested

  • Avoid catastrophic loss

  • Not cap upside

The portfolio outperforms because of variance, not despite it.

Angel syndication: VC-style sampling for individuals

Most individuals can’t run a VC fund.

But angel syndication lets you replicate the structure:

  • Access a larger opportunity set

  • Make smaller bets across many deals

  • Accept that most won’t matter

  • Let a few outliers do the work

It’s not about prediction.
It’s not about hit rate.
It’s about constructing a sample that allows extreme outcomes to matter.

The mental shift

Indexing is large-sample thinking.
Outperformance comes from selective small-sample exposure.

You’re not trying to beat the market every year.
You’re trying to be positioned for the years — and the investments — that matter disproportionately.

That’s the pyramid.
That’s the funnel.
That’s the math.

This Week’s Affiliates

Homeowners: Don’t miss winter insurance savings

EverQuote is designed to make your seasonal insurance refresh effortless.

Fast Process: Skip repetitive forms and get matched in minutes.

More Ways to Save: Compare rates from both national and local carriers.

Winter-Ready Coverage: Enter the holidays with clarity and confidence.

And for homeowners, the benefits can go even further. Many qualify for lower auto insurance rates, and reviewing your options now can lead to real savings before winter weather peaks. With EverQuote, checking those potential savings takes only moments.

Whether you’re hauling gifts, driving through snow, or gearing up for the new year, now is the perfect time to ensure your coverage keeps you protected—and your holiday budget comfortable.

Wall Street Isn’t Warning You, But This Chart Might

Vanguard just projected public markets may return only 5% annually over the next decade. In a 2024 report, Goldman Sachs forecasted the S&P 500 may return just 3% annually for the same time frame—stats that put current valuations in the 7th percentile of history.

Translation? The gains we’ve seen over the past few years might not continue for quite a while.

Meanwhile, another asset class—almost entirely uncorrelated to the S&P 500 historically—has overall outpaced it for decades (1995-2024), according to Masterworks data.

Masterworks lets everyday investors invest in shares of multimillion-dollar artworks by legends like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso.

And they’re not just buying. They’re exiting—with net annualized returns like 17.6%, 17.8%, and 21.5% among their 23 sales.*

Wall Street won’t talk about this. But the wealthy already are. Shares in new offerings can sell quickly but…

*Past performance is not indicative of future returns. Important Reg A disclosures: masterworks.com/cd.